Introduction:
Social media is a place that comes with a lot of benefits, but also a lot of risks. It’s often used for learning and self-improvement, sharing your life with others, chatting about hobbies, but on the other side of this people also use it to promote violence, sow discord, or spread hate in the name of free speech. Florida is now asking the Supreme Court to take action.
Watch the video and then do the accompanying English language exercises below.
The news is a consistent and endless source of entertainment, knowledge and discovery. Because it plays such a vital part in our lives and is so important to keep up with, it’s doubtless a piece of your daily routine that can’t go ignored.
There are many reasons to read, watch or listen to the news. Understanding the ramifications of recent legislation passed. Listening to recent events and grasping the potential consequences to your country. Or, simply listening to what’s happening in other countries so you can compare them to your own. It’s a staple in our lives and the most reliable way to get information.
That’s why Scrambled Eggs has decided to unite two of your biggest worlds: learning English and keeping up with current events. We hope our challenging exercises, composed of listening, vocabulary and comprehension exercises in English, bring these worlds together in a satisfactory and entertaining way.
So that’s all for the introductions, let’s get to today’s Learn English with the News topic:
Quiz Time!
Florida Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Social Media Law | Definition Match
Quiz-summary
0 of 10 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
Information
Definition Match (10 Questions)
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 10 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
-
Nice job! Is that what you were expecting? If you didn’t, to take the quiz a second time for free!
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 10
1. Question
COMPEL
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite, better luck next time!
-
Question 2 of 10
2. Question
HOST
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite, better luck next time!
-
Question 3 of 10
3. Question
PROHIBIT
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite, better luck next time!
-
Question 4 of 10
4. Question
INFRINGE
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite, better luck next time!
-
Question 5 of 10
5. Question
APPEAL
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite, better luck next time!
-
Question 6 of 10
6. Question
FORCE
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite, better luck next time!
-
Question 7 of 10
7. Question
SUE
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite, better luck next time!
-
Question 8 of 10
8. Question
LANDMARK
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite, better luck next time!
-
Question 9 of 10
9. Question
WEIGH IN
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite, better luck next time!
-
Question 10 of 10
10. Question
RESHAPE
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite, better luck next time!
Florida Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Social Media Law | Fill in the Blank
Quiz-summary
0 of 1 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
Information
Fill in the Blank (10 Questions)
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 1 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
-
Nice work! Did you get the result you were expecting? If not, feel free to take the quiz a second time!
- 1
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 1
1. Question
FORCE – RESHAPE – SUE – APPEALS – HOST – COMPELLING – LANDMARK – WEIGH IN – PROHIBITED – INFRINGED
- Florida has asked the Supreme Court to rule on whether states can (force) social media companies to host content they would prefer removing. This is setting up a potential (landmark) battle over digital speech rights and content moderation that could (reshape) the country’s First Amendment relationship. Florida’s attorney general argued that the ability of major social media platforms to promote the views of some users over others means it is critical for justices to (weigh in). One Florida law is at the center of this controversy. The law in question allows political candidates to (sue) social media companies if they are blocked or removed from platforms longer than 14 days. Opponents representing the tech industry had sued to block that law, arguing it (infringed) on private companies’ First Amendment rights. Earlier this year, a federal (appeals) court agreed with that reasoning, ultimately leading to Florida’s petition for Supreme Court intervention. Legal experts believe that if the law survives being challenged, tech companies could be forced to (host) spam, hate speech and other material that is legal but problematic. It may also rewrite decades of First Amendment precedent that (prohibited) governments from (compelling) private parties to host speech.
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite. Try again.
Florida Asks Supreme Court to Rule on Social Media Law | True or False
Quiz-summary
0 of 5 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Information
True or False (5 Questions)
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 5 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
-
Nice work! Did you get the result you were expecting? If not, feel free to take the quiz a second time!
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 5
1. Question
The US First Amendment refers to “Freedom of speech.”
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite. Try again.
-
Question 2 of 5
2. Question
Social Media companies are against the Florida law.
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite. Try again.
-
Question 3 of 5
3. Question
Hate speech is illegal to post online.
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite. Try again.
-
Question 4 of 5
4. Question
Politicians can sue Social Media companies for banning them.
Correct
Well done.
Incorrect
Not quite. Try again.
-
Question 5 of 5
5. Question
Social Media has the power to promote certain views over other views.
Correct
Well done!
Incorrect
Not quite. Try again.
And that’s it for today’s English lesson, where you can improve your English with the news and current events. Do you have any comments or special requests for us for the next edition of Learn English with the News? Be sure to leave any feedback you have in the comments section below. We would love to help you on your quest to learn the English language!
For other Learn English with the News segments, be sure to check out the rest of our posts:
https://scrambledeggsinglese.
Full text:
Florida has asked the Supreme Court to rule on whether states can force social media companies to host content they would prefer removing. This is setting up a potential landmark battle over digital speech rights and content moderation that could reshape the country’s First Amendment relationship.
Florida’s attorney general argued that the ability of major social media platforms to promote the views of some users over others means it is critical for justices to weigh in. One Florida law is at the center of this controversy. The law in question allows political candidates to sue social media companies if they are blocked or removed from platforms longer than 14 days.
Opponents representing the tech industry had sued to block that law, arguing it infringed on private companies’ First Amendment rights. Earlier this year, a federal appeals court agreed with that reasoning, ultimately leading to Florida’s petition for Supreme Court intervention.
Legal experts believe that if the law survives being challenged, tech companies could be forced to host spam, hate speech and other material that is legal but problematic. It may also rewrite decades of First Amendment precedent that prohibited governments from compelling private parties to host speech.